Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Tisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ascione, J.), entered October 20, 1883, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the first, third, fourth and fifth causes of action of plaintiff-respondent’s amended complaint, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of dismissing the third cause of action for an account stated, and otherwise affirmed, without *779costs. H Plaintiff-respondent Bernstein, an interior decorator, brought this action for damages for breach of a contract involving interior decorating of defendants-appellants’ home in Purchase, New York, and of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Volkening v. . DegraafNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Gurney, Becker & Bourne, Inc. v. Benderson Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, L. L. P. v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Legum v. RuthenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Yannelli, Zevin & Civardi v. SakolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Tracy v. Talkline Broadcasting Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API