Legal Opinion
Otero v. Jennings
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 1988No. 86 Civ. 2400 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Michael Jennings (“Jennings”) and the City of New York (the “City”) (collectively the “Defendants”) have moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. dismissing plaintiff Manuel Otero’s (“Otero”) claims against Jennings for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, 1 and his claim against the City for faulty firing, training, supervision, and discipline of its police officers. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
Facts
This case arises out of Otero’s March 25, 1985 entry into apartment 7-F at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- George R. Zanghi v. The Incorporated Village of Old Brookville, the Old Brookville Police Department, John Kenary and Kenneth WileCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carthew v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Brawer v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Merriman v. Town of ColonieDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996