Legal Opinion

Thomas v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1996No. COA95-1310PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

In Anderson I, we determined “that 7 U.S.C.A. § 2015(b)(1) (1991) requires that food stamp disqualification periods begin immediately upon a finding that a violation has been committed.” 109 N.C. App. at 682, 428 S.E.2d at 268. In reaching this conclusion, the Anderson I court supplied the following reasoning:

The Food Stamp Act of 1977 provides that:

Any person who has been found by any State or federal court or administrative agency to have intentionally (A) made a false or misleading statement . . . for the purpose of . . . receiving . . . coupons . . . shall, immediately upon…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re a Declaratory Ruling by the North Carolina Commissioner of Insurance Regarding 11 N.C.A.C. 12.0319Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. In Re the Investigation Into the Injury of BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Bailey & Associates, Inc. v. Wilmington Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Hamilton v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API