Legal Opinion
Heydemann v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1939Published
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
In February, 1928, Natalie G. Heydemann, as sole heir and legatee of Deitrich Heydemann, filed -a summons and complaint in the Supreme Court, New York County, demanding a money judgment against the Russian Electric Corporation, a *1006foreign corporation. A warrant of attachment was granted on February 27, 1928, and the next day it was served upon the National City Bank and the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, the defendant herein. Both of these companies made returns alleging that they had no property of the defendant. Nothing further was done regarding this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Dimmerling v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.