West End Manufacturing Co. v. P. R. Warren Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract for goods sold and delivered as stated in the opinion. The answer was a general denial. Writ dated April 14, 1906. In the Superior Court the case was tried before Hardy, J. The order for the goods was contained in the following letter of the defendant addressed to the president of the plaintiff: “ Mr. F. G. Perkins, Pres.
Read the full summary
Contract for goods sold and delivered as stated in the opinion. The answer was a general denial. Writ dated April 14, 1906. In the Superior Court the case was tried before Hardy, J. The order for the goods was contained in the following letter of the defendant addressed to the president of the plaintiff: “ Mr. F. G. Perkins, Pres. West End Manufacturing Co., 73 Murray Street, New York, N. Y. “ Dear Mr. Perkins: “ I have before me your letters of the 10th, 16th and 18th and trust you will pardon my delay in making reply. I have been very busy of late and I turned your financial letter of the…
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.
This is an action of contract for goods sold and delivered, which, under the designation “Manila lined chip,” were ordered of the plaintiff by the defendant by mail. The letter referred to accompanying specifications and gave shipping directions and a statement of the purpose of the defendant to have the roll stock coated. There were four sets of specifications, each giving quantity, size, weight and price, *324and describing the goods ordered only as “ Manila lined chip.”
There were interviews between representatives of the plaintiff and of the defendant several weeks before the order was sent,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Young & Conant Manufacturing Co. v. WakefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Hight v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Rodman v. GuilfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Hanson & Parker, Ltd. v. WittenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Fisher v. DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Mark v. Stuart-Howland Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.