Wilbert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an employee who uses “bumping” rights to avoid or postpone losing his job can deduct the living expenses that he incurs when he finds himself working far from home as a result of exercising those rights. The Tax Court ruled against the taxpayer, T.C. Memo 2007-152, 2007 WL 1713379, assessing a deficiency of $4,380 in his income tax payments for 2003, and he appeals. This is one of a number of largely identical cases in the Tax Court, see, e.g., Wasik v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2007-148, 2007 WL 1702689; Stephens v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Peurifoy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Donald P. Kasun and Joyce J. Kasun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Sherman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Wilson John Fisher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Milam v. DOMINICK'S FINER FOODS, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Ahmad Milam v. Dominick's Finer Foods, IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Jude O. Ugwuala and Esther N. Ugwuala v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Liljeberg v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017