Legal Opinion

Haack v. Rodenbour

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1944No. 46397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMantz, J.

This is a law action in replevin in which the plaintiff, Roy Haaek, brought suit against the defendant, John Rodenbour, Jr., alleging ownership and right to the immediate possession of a certain bull which he claimed was held by the defendant without lawful or legal right. In his petition plaintiff demands immediate possession of such bull, or the value, thereof if the same cannot be found, and also damages for its illegal and wrongful detention.

Defendant denied the claims of plaintiff and alleged that said bull came upon his premises as a trespasser; that while thereon said bull attacked and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hansen v. KemmishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Richards v. W. H. Hellen & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Kingsbury v. BuchananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  4. Burleigh & Jackson v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Wheeler v. WoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruble v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Iowa Truck Center, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Marx Truck Line, Inc. v. FredricksenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Mallory v. JurgenaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Glenn v. KeedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API