Bray v. Burke

While the 15-year-old infant plaintiff was caddying for one of a golf foursome, which foursome included the defendant, Burke, he was struck and injured by a *293golf ball hit by Burke. The infant plaintiff and his father sue both Burke and the golf club and allege affirmative acts of negligence against both defendants.

The defendant club moves for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. It contends that the alleged injuries were sustained during the course of the infant plaintiff’s employment by the club; that the club carried workmen’s compensation insurance coverage…