Legal Opinion

Brannon v. . Sprinkle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtScheNOK, J.

The determinative question in this case, which is raised by the exception to the denial of the motion for a judgment as of non-suit, is whether there was sufficient evidence of actionable negligence, as alleged in the complaint, to be submitted to the jury.

The plaintiff alleges, inter alia, “That upon the property described, . . . the defendants did, on 30 May, 1931, and for a great while previous thereto, maintain and allow to remain in an unprotected, exposed, and unfenced condition a brick well which was some fifty feet, *400more or less, deep; was of square dimensions, the opening of which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API