Brannon v. . Sprinkle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNOK, J.
The determinative question in this case, which is raised by the exception to the denial of the motion for a judgment as of non-suit, is whether there was sufficient evidence of actionable negligence, as alleged in the complaint, to be submitted to the jury.
The plaintiff alleges, inter alia, “That upon the property described, . . . the defendants did, on 30 May, 1931, and for a great while previous thereto, maintain and allow to remain in an unprotected, exposed, and unfenced condition a brick well which was some fifty feet, *400more or less, deep; was of square dimensions, the opening of which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.