Brunet v. City Of Columbus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
1 F.3d 390
62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,479
Ann BRUNET and Denise Sachs, on behalf of themselves and the
class they represent, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Guy E. Tucker; James T. Meyer; Stuart J. Tudor; and
Joseph S. Hilleary, on behalf of themselves and
the class they represent,
Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF COLUMBUS; Ohio Columbus Civil Service Commission;
Dana Rinehart; Alphonso Montgomery, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 92-3340, 92-3893 and 92-4102.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued March 18, 1993.
Decided July 28, 1993.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 4,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.