Legal Opinion

Brunet v. City Of Columbus

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1993No. 92-3340Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 F.3d 390

62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,479

Ann BRUNET and Denise Sachs, on behalf of themselves and the

class they represent, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Guy E. Tucker; James T. Meyer; Stuart J. Tudor; and

Joseph S. Hilleary, on behalf of themselves and

the class they represent,

Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF COLUMBUS; Ohio Columbus Civil Service Commission;

Dana Rinehart; Alphonso Montgomery, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 92-3340, 92-3893 and 92-4102.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued March 18, 1993.

Decided July 28, 1993.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 4,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API