Legal Opinion

Bates v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 28, 2005No. 01-04-00033-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.

Appellant, John Wayne Bates, challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. In his sole point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for forensic DNA testing. We affirm.

Background

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced him to life imprisonment. In 1992, this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction. See Bates v. State, No. 01-90-00809-CR, 1992 WL 76400 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 16, 1992, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication). In July 2001,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  2. Carlos Mario Delarosa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
  3. Chelce White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  4. Freddie Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. John Cloud v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API