McHenry v. Marr
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cecil County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following is the defendant’s third bill of exceptions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cecil County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following is the defendant’s third bill of exceptions. The plaintiffs offered the following prayers: 1. If the jury find from the evidence in the cause that the relation of landlord and tenant existed between the defendant and the plaintiffs of the premises mentioned in the declaration, and which were used b'y the plaintiffs for the prosecution of their lawful business at the time of the happening of the injuries alleged, and that during the continuance of said relation the defendant applied…
1Opinion of the CourtBowie, J.
The appellees, as co-partners, claiming possession of a certain messuage and premises in the city of Baltimore, known as the “ Monumental Bowling Alley,” with the appurtenances, sued the appellant in the Circuit Court for Harford County, and by their narr. averred, that being possessed of said messuage, in which before and at the time of the committing of the grievances thereinafter alleged, they carried on a remunerative business, as proprietors and managers of the bowling alley and public bar, then and there kept open for the patronage of the public ; whilst being so occupied, the defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- State v. HopkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- White Automobile Co. v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Vogel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.