Legal Opinion

Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 2002No. 596A01PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

562 S.E.2d 422 (2002)

355 N.C. 483

Beatrice WOODY, Employee

v.

THOMASVILLE UPHOLSTERY INCORPORATED, Employer,

Self-Insured (Helsman-Management Services, Inc., Servicing Agent).

No. 596A01.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 10, 2002.

Mary F. Pyron, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.

Morris York Williams Surles & Barringer, LLP by Thomas E. Williams and Stephen Kushner, Charlotte; and Orbock Bowden Ruark & Dillard by Maureen S. Orbock and Devin F. Thomas, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.

2Per curiam

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pitillo v. N.C. Department of Environmental Health & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Knight v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Bursell v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Robbins v. Wake County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Boyd v. First Tennessee Nat. Corp.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API