Legal Opinion

Muhtar v. Goldman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 1982No. 80-2392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal taken by the seller of real property from an adverse final judgment of specific performance, as amended, entered by the trial court below in favor of the buyer of said realty. We have carefully and painstakingly examined the evidence adduced at the trial below to determine whether sufficient evidence was presented to support the final judgment. We conclude that no such evidence was presented in this record and reverse.

The law is well-settled that “in a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real estate the plaintiff must do more than merely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Humphrys v. JarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Miller v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Hi-Acres Groves, Inc. v. BassettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Miller v. GardnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Scott v. Anchor Inn Apartments, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brevard County Fair Ass'n, Inc. v. Cocoa Expo, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Poinciana Properties, Ltd. v. Englander Triangle, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Gross v. BartlettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API