Legal Opinion

Alexander v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1919No. 10297Published

Indictment for obstructing legal process; from Taliaferro superior court—Judge Walker. November 27, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error, on the ' ground that “The bill of exceptions was not tendered within twenty days after the overruling of the motion for a new trial,” is overruled. The bill of exceptions contains a recital that it was presented “within twenty days from the date of the order overruling the said motion for new trial.” “Where the bill of exceptions contains a recital that it was tendered within the time prescribed by law, the writ of error, will not be dismissed [on the ground that it was not tendered within that time], although it appears that the judge did not sign…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harnage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Strickland v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Gaskin v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API