Legal Opinion

Leola Johnson Bell and David Arthur Bell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1955No. 15113_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

The question presented on this petition for review is as to the correctness-of the decision of the Tax Court that taxpayers, husband and wife, who filed separate returns under the community property system in Louisiana, failed to report partnership income to which the husband became entitled during the year 1947. Taxpayers were residents of Louisiana and jurisdiction is conferred on the court to entertain this petition for review by the provisions of Section 1141 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by Section 36 of the Act of June 25, 1948, 26 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bourne v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  2. Ruprecht v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. BasyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  3. Marvin D. Eagle, Jr. And Geraldine Eagle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Commissioner v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. MacDonald v. MacDonaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API