Legal Opinion · Dissent

Levinski v. Middlesex Banking Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1899No. 735Published

In Error to (.lie Circuit Court of the United States for the If or them District of Texas.

1DissentParlange, District Judge

The plaintiff below alleged that the Middlesex Banking Company bound itself to advance him $8,000, and knew that he intended, with the larger part of the money, to build certain houses. He alleged that the Middlesex Banking Company failed and refused to comply with its obligation to furnish the money, the result being that the plaintiff below was unable to build the houses. He claimed damages to the amount of $7,800, consisting of the following items: Loss of rent which plaintiff below claimed he would have received if he had not been prevented from building the houses, $6,000; increase of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Schunk v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddart Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API