Little v. Danville & White Lick Plank Road Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hendricks Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This suit originated before a justice of the peace. The appellee was the plaintiff, and William and Robert Little were the defendants. The plaintiff in her complaint before the justice alleges, 1. That defendants on, &c., at, &c., did then and there, with intent to defraud the plaintiff, run by her gate, on said road, without paying their toll; they, the defendants, being then and there in, and driving, a four wheeled buggy, drawn by one horse, over the plaintiff’s road, and being then and there liable to pay ten cents toll thereon, &e., wherefore the defendants, by force of the statute, &c.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Bishop v. Kingston & Middletown Turnpike Road Co.New York Supreme Court · 1840
- Brookville & Greensburg Turnpike Co. v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Bogart v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
- Tripp v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
- Hartford v. HosmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowlus v. BrierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Shriver v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Hutts v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- First Nat. Bank of Clarion v. HamorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1891
- Hall v. SpurgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864