Legal Opinion

Little v. Danville & White Lick Plank Road Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This suit originated before a justice of the peace. The appellee was the plaintiff, and William and Robert Little were the defendants. The plaintiff in her complaint before the justice alleges, 1. That defendants on, &c., at, &c., did then and there, with intent to defraud the plaintiff, run by her gate, on said road, without paying their toll; they, the defendants, being then and there in, and driving, a four wheeled buggy, drawn by one horse, over the plaintiff’s road, and being then and there liable to pay ten cents toll thereon, &e., wherefore the defendants, by force of the statute, &c.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bishop v. Kingston & Middletown Turnpike Road Co.New York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Brookville & Greensburg Turnpike Co. v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Bogart v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Tripp v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  5. Hartford v. HosmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowlus v. BrierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Shriver v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hutts v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. First Nat. Bank of Clarion v. HamorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1891
  5. Hall v. SpurgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API