Legal Opinion

Chiarelli v. Pentino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiffs’ appeal does not seek to secure corrections in the finding, hence there was no reason for the making of the evidence a part of the record. Unless the appeal assigns as error the findings as made, or in failing to make other findings, the court should not certify the evidence on appeal. The continued violation of our rule in this particular imposes upon the State a large and unnecessary burden of expense.

The defendant paid to plaintiffs $300, and to the second mortgagees on plaintiffs’ premises $1,500, and in return therefor the plaintiffs gave him their note for $1,800, and as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southworth v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kuehne v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Cottrell v. CottrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Zuch v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Balzano v. BalzanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Barca v. MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API