Legal Opinion
In re: Ashkan Rajaee and Nassim Rajaee v. Christopher R. Barclay
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 31, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00667Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 In re: Case No.: 25-cv-667-RSH-KSC 12 ASHKAN RAJAEE and NASSIM (Appeal from S.D. Cal. Bankr. 13 RAJAEE, Case No. 3:24-bk-00617-CL) Debtors. 14 _________________________________ ORDER AFFIRMING RULING OF 15 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT AND ASHKAN RAJAEE, ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS 16 Appellant, 17 v. [ECF Nos. 6, 8, 22] 18 CHRISTOPHER R. BARCLAY, 19 Chapter 7 Trustee, TYLER DAVIS, and 20 TOPDEVZ, LLC, 21 Appellees. 22 23 Appellant Ashkan Rajaee (“Appellant” or “Rajaee”) appeals pro se from a March 6, 24 2025 order…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kemp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Carol Freeman Marsch, Debtor (Two Cases). John D. Marsch, Claimant-Appellant v. Carol F. Marsch, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Zimmerman v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.