Wooten-Bey v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKWELL, Judge.
In this criminal case, we are asked to determine whether the trial judge improperly prohibited attorney-client discussions during a lunch recess, allegedly in violation of the defendant’s right to the assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment. We hold there is no constitutional violation under the circumstances.
The relevant portion of the record which contains the issue is found at the end of defense counsel’s direct examination of petitioner, Ronald Nathaniel Wooten-Bey (Wooten-Bey). The following colloquy occurred:
MR. CHRISTMAS (Defense Counsel): Your honor, I think I…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Pryor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Hill v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Velez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.