Legal Opinion

Sroka v. Sroka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in confirming the Referee’s report and directing her, upon the Referee’s recommendation, to pay $14,000 to defendant. *898However, plaintiff did not challenge the Referee’s report and recommendation by making a motion to reject the report pursuant to CPLR 4403. That section affords the parties “the opportunity ‘of pointing out in what respects, if any, the Referee’s report or his conduct of the proceedings is erroneous’ ” before the court takes action on it (Matter of Breland [MVAIC'], 24 AD2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF GALIBER v. PreviteNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Berkowitz v. HalberstamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. O'Donnell v. O'DonnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.. v. SewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Jones v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Broadway Warehouse Co. v. Buffalo Barn Bd., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API