Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Pablo Carranza

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2014No. 2014AP001242-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Pablo Carranza has filed a petition for voluntary revocation of his license to practice law in Wisconsin pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.19.1 Attorney Carranza is the subject of eleven Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) grievance investigations in which the Preliminary Review Committee (PRC) found cause to proceed with a total of 38 counts of misconduct. In addition, Attorney Carranza is the subject of two additional pending OLR grievance matters that have not yet been fully investigated by the OLR or brought to the PRC. Attorney Carranza states in his petition that he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. MularskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Pablo CarranzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Theodore F. MazzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API