Legal Opinion
Claim of Manceri v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Gavagan, J.
Motion by an infant plaintiff, by his guardian ad litem, for permission to file a notice of claim after the prescribed time. In opposition, the City of New York urges that this court has no jurisdiction since the alleged cause of action accrued in Kings County.
Subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law states that the application shall be made returnable at a Trial or 'Special Term of the Supreme Court in the county where an action on the claim could properly be brought for trial.
Section 182-b of the Civil Practice Act states that all actions wherein the City of New York is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schnee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Pascucci v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Marino v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mangual v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- West v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1991
- Keaton v. KennedyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Mangual v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963