Legal Opinion

Stone v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 3, 1939No. 3053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In Stone v. Johnson, 89 N. H. 329, the plaintiff sued in tort for the same injuries for which she now seeks recovery. It was there held, on her application to amend the case by claiming liability of the defendant personally instead of in a representative capacity, that the facts demonstrated her assumption of the risk. The application was therefore denied.

She now seeks to recover against the defendant personally in an action on the alleged contract. But it was stated in Stone v. Johnson, supra, 331, that she could not recover on the “alleged promise of the defendant to leave the lights…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Stone v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Busick v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API