Legal Opinion

Edward Wooten and Sarkis Oganyan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. BioLife Plasma Services L.P. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 22, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00099Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EDWARD WOOTEN and SARKIS No. 1:25-cv-00099-KES-SKO OGANYAN, individually and on behalf of 10 all others similarly situated, 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 12 v. Doc. 19 13 BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES L.P. and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., 14 INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs Evan Wooten and Sarkis Oganyan proceed on their first amended class action 19 complaint (“FAC”), on behalf of themselves and others, against defendants BioLife Plasma 20 Services L.P. (“BioLife”) and Takeda…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API