Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Hanlin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In the Coui’t of Common Pleas of Westmoreland county, to which this writ of error was directed, Boyle Irvine, the plaintiff below, and plaintiff in error, brought this action of assumpsit against William- Hanlin, to recover the value of certain ore, and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favour of the defendant, the court below having charged the jury, that the action was not maintainable. The circumstances of the case appeared on the trial to be as follows.

Read the full summary

In the Coui’t of Common Pleas of Westmoreland county, to which this writ of error was directed, Boyle Irvine, the plaintiff below, and plaintiff in error, brought this action of assumpsit against William- Hanlin, to recover the value of certain ore, and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favour of the defendant, the court below having charged the jury, that the action was not maintainable. The circumstances of the case appeared on the trial to be as follows. James Hanlin, an infant, and Boyle Irvine, were tenants in common of a tract of land from which the ore was taken, for the price of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court, (Tilghman, J. being absent,) was delivered by

Duncan, J.

It may be proper, to dispose of the suggestion of the counsel of the plaintiff in error, that William Hanlin, received part of the money in his own wrong, when he was not the guardian, and therefore no action of account render would lie against him for this. If this be so, then it is very clear, the action for

money had and received will not lie against him, if he was a trespasser and intruder, for in Haldaine & al. v. Duche’s Executors, 1 Yeates, 129, Judge Yeates, in an elaborate opinion which he ’ had prepared,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mather v. Ministers of Trinity ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1817
  2. Morris v. TarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1785
  3. Haldane v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1792

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. EichelbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  2. M'Creary v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. McFadden v. SalladaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  4. Taylor v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
  5. Urie v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API