Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Oppenheimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Plaintiff has brought this suit to set aside the separation agreement, to declare the divorce decree null and void and for a decree of separation with an allowance of alimony and counsel fee.

Upon the trial, it was proved that while plaintiff was a patient of the New York Psychiatric Institute, the defendant, her husband, secured her signature to a separation agreement and to a power of attorney for an uncontested divorce. With the *249latter he obtained a Mexican decree of divorce, incorporating the terms of the separation agreement, which provides for the payment to her of the sum of $500 in two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Tirrell v. . TirrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Haas v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Smith v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Jackson v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. OppenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Bunin v. BuninNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Beutel v. BeutelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API