Legal Opinion
LoPresto v. State Employees Retirement Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 24, 1994No. 12483PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendant state employees retirement commission appeals from the judgment of the trial court reversing the commission’s declaratory ruling. On appeal, the commission claims that the trial court improperly concluded that the plaintiff, Donald F. LoPresto, was entitled to include five years of municipal service credit in the calculation of his hazardous duty retirement benefit. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are undisputed. The plaintiff is a retired state police trooper. He retired effective March 1, 1992, under the 1991-1992 early retirement…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LoPresto v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- LoPresto v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994