Legal Opinion

Transbel Investment Co. v. Venetos

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crane, Ch. J.

The complaint in this action was dismissed on motion made under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, subdivision 6, on the ground that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement thereof. The complaint is brought upon a promissory note which, if it be under seal, comes within the twenty-year Statute of Limitations. The question presented on the motion was whether the note was a sealed instrument merely because it had opposite the maker’s name the word “ Seal,” and, if not, whether a question of fact was presented calling for a trial,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Cochran v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Matter of PirieNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Smith v. HenningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Warfield v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Classen-Smith v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Batavia Townhouses v. Council of Churches Housing Development Fund CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. DeLuca v. ApfelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API