Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Matthew

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff relies on sec. 262.12, Stats., which, in its material parts, recites:

“Publication or service outside state, when permitted. When the summons cannot with due diligence be served within the state, the service of the summons may be made without the state or by publication upon a defendant when it appears from the verified complaint that he is a necessary or proper party to an action or special proceeding as provided in Rule 262.13, in any of the following cases:
“(1) When such defendant is a nonresident of this state or his residence is unknown, or is a foreign corporation, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Witt v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Maxcy v. McCordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Schultz v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API