Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Weinheimer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by Geo. S. Holmes, agent, against W. S. Weinheimer. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. cite: As to validity of tax deeds: 31 S. C., 553; 2 Bay., 219; 10 S. C., 125; 50 S. C., 159; Black on Tax Titles, 535; 2 Curtis C. C., 139; 15 111., 7; 25 Ency., 1 ed., 717; Rev. Stat., 220; 2 Bail., 600; 20 Stat., 1261; Dwarris St., 178; 23 Ency., 1 ed., 297. Proceedings of Mount Pleasant are void: 20 St., 126; 19 St., 863; Gen. St., 283; 31 S. C., 567; 15 S. C., 158.-…

Read the full summary

Action by Geo. S. Holmes, agent, against W. S. Weinheimer. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. cite: As to validity of tax deeds: 31 S. C., 553; 2 Bay., 219; 10 S. C., 125; 50 S. C., 159; Black on Tax Titles, 535; 2 Curtis C. C., 139; 15 111., 7; 25 Ency., 1 ed., 717; Rev. Stat., 220; 2 Bail., 600; 20 Stat., 1261; Dwarris St., 178; 23 Ency., 1 ed., 297. Proceedings of Mount Pleasant are void: 20 St., 126; 19 St., 863; Gen. St., 283; 31 S. C., 567; 15 S. C., 158.- If charter of Mount Pleasant makes its taxes first lien, it is unconstitutional: Con., art. III., sec. 32; 51 S. C., 5;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The plaintiff, George S. Holmes, instituted this suit in 1899, to recover of the defendant, W. S. Weinheimer, a lot in the town of Mount Pleasant. The lot was sold by the sheriff of Charleston County ’as the property of William .Horry for the collection of the State and county taxes, on January 4th, 1897, and bought by the plaintiff; and he claims under the title made by the sheriff to him. On June 7th, 1897, a lot, which plaintiff alleges is the same lot, was sold by the intendant of Mount Pleasant as the property of W. H. Horry for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  2. Coates & Sons v. EarlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Burwell & Dunn Co v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Great Falls v. JeffriesMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API