Legal Opinion
Arizona v. Ott (In Re Ott)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 10, 1998No. 14-40121PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP H. BRANDT, Bankruptcy Judge.
The State of Arizona (“Arizona” or “State”) moves for summary judgment against Defendant-Debtor Calvin D. Ott (“Ott”), seeking declaratory judgment that its judgment requiring him to disgorge $1,394,000.00 under Arizona’s Racketeering Act (Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 13-2314) is nondisehargeable under the Bankruptcy Code. 1 I will grant the motion.
I. ISSUES
A. Is Arizona’s judgment nondisehargeable under § 523(a)(7)?
B. Does the three-year limitation of § 523(a)(7)(B) apply to the Arizona Racketeering Act’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pavelich v. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP (In Re Pavelich)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Fowler v. Jenkins (In Re Jenkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
- Thaler v. County of Nassau District Attorney (In Re Wolfson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. Jones (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2004
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.