Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Brown

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided April 15, 1895Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Summit Comity,

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

This is a proceeding in which the reversal of the judgment of the common pleas is sought. The judgment was in favor of Brown, who was plaintiff, against Bailey, who was ^.defendant below. I shall use the terms “plaintiff” and “defendant” as they appear in the petition in error.

The undisputed facts are, that the-plaintiff Bailey, sometime in March, 1892, entered into a contract with the National Sewer Pipe Company, a corporation located and doing business at Barberton, Ohio, by which he agreed to erect for the corporation by The National Sewer Pipe Company.

He-was to furnish all materials, do…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Cook v. McCabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Garretty v. BrazellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Clark v. BusseIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API