Bailey v. Brown
Ohio Circuit Courts
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Summit Comity,
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
This is a proceeding in which the reversal of the judgment of the common pleas is sought. The judgment was in favor of Brown, who was plaintiff, against Bailey, who was ^.defendant below. I shall use the terms “plaintiff” and “defendant” as they appear in the petition in error.
The undisputed facts are, that the-plaintiff Bailey, sometime in March, 1892, entered into a contract with the National Sewer Pipe Company, a corporation located and doing business at Barberton, Ohio, by which he agreed to erect for the corporation by The National Sewer Pipe Company.
He-was to furnish all materials, do…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Cook v. McCabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Garretty v. BrazellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Clark v. BusseIllinois Supreme Court · 1876