Lofthouse v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentWintersheimer, Justice
I respectfully dissent in part from the majority opinion because reckless homicide is a viable and appropriate avenue to address Lofthouse’s conduct under the facts presented. I would affirm the conviction in all respects.
The legislature of this Commonwealth promulgated KRS 507.050 defining reckless homicide, and in so doing fashioned a tool responsive to a broad range of conduct which, while not culpable to the same degree as intentional or wanton murder, still demands proportional condemnation.
The gravamen of the offense is the failure to perceive a substantial and unjustified risk when…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commonwealth v. CatalinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Elliott v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Eversole v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- People v. CrucianiNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.