Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided September 5, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Keith W. Bricklemyer Lake St. Charles Community Development District Attorney 111 East Madison Street, Suite 2400 Tampa, Florida 33602-4708

Dear Mr. Bricklemyer:

You have asked for my opinion on substantially the following questions:

1. Is the Lake St. Charles Community Development District authorized to enter into a contract with a cable franchisee for that franchisee to provide a combination of services to include basic cable television, community recreation information, and security monitoring for the residents of the district?

2. If the answer to Question One is in the affirmative, is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaganSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Warner Cable Communications, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. City of NicevilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Byrd v. City of NicevilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. State v. FRONTIER ACRES COMMUNITY DEVELOP. DIST. PASCO COUNTYSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Warner Cable Communications, Inc. v. City of NicevilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API