Legal Opinion
Bertke v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 7, 2006No. 5D05-4187PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
927 So.2d 76 (2006)
Richard Arthur BERTKE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 5D05-4187.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 7, 2006.
Richard A. Bertke, Lowell, Pro Se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
MONACO, J.
Richard Arthur Bertke petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting that his appellate counsel was ineffective. Because the petitioner's appellate counsel failed to argue that the trial court erred in giving the forcible felony exception to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. RiechmannSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Giles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Rich v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Cleveland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Sipple v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Blanton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006