Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Columbus

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1915No. 20,247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; James N. Dunbar, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained through neglect of the city to repair its streets. A general verdict was returned for the plaintiff. With the verdict the jury returned special findings of fact. The defendant moved for judgment in its favor on the special findings. The motion was denied and the defendant appeals.

As the result of a previous trial judgment was entered for the plaintiff. On appeal the judgment was reversed for failure of proof to sustain a material allegation of the petition. (Martin v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Adams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. McBeth v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. A. T. & S. F. Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tacha v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Mitchell v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Bolinger v. GilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Haley v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Case v. YoakumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API