Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gold v. Salem Lutheran Home Assn.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1959No. S. F. 20008Published

1DissentPeters, J.

I dissent. The majority opinion permits the Home to retain money received by it for a prospective life membership in a situation where the prospective life member died before the commencement date of the relationship, that is, on the date of death the legal relationship between the contracting parties had not yet commenced. The reasoning employed by the majority in reaching such an unjust result is based on a major fallacy.

Decedent was not a life member of the Home on the date of his death. His only status on that date was that of a probationary guest, fully paid up until October 1, 1956. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coyne v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Wilson's Administrator v. NolenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Campbell v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District v. National Surety Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. In Re Roy's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API