Legal Opinion
Hearty v. Ragunda
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
This is a libel in admiralty against the S. S. Ragunda in rem and against Norton, Lilly & Company in personam to recover damages in connection with the shipment of certain pears received by the vessel at Buenos Aires, Argentina, for delivery to libelants in New York.
The libel is in customary form except for Articles Sixteenth and Seventeenth, as to which respondents filed exceptions which are now before the Court for disposition.
In substance, the first fifteen articles of the libel allege that the S. S. Ragunda was owned, operated and controlled by the respondent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ketterer v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Tan Hi v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Krause v. Republic Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961