Davis v. FCA US LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WENDI-MAE DAVIS, No. 2:20-cv-00799-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FCA US LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 In this case involving plaintiff’s allegedly defective vehicle, plaintiff moves to 18 remand on the basis that defendants have failed to show removal was proper. For the reasons 19 below, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to remand. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 On or around September 26, 2015, plaintiff Wendi-Mae Davis (“plaintiff”) 22 purchased the vehicle in question, a 2015 Chrysler 300, from…