Legal Opinion

City of Town & Country v. Goldman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1989No. 56451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Plaintiff owns a tract of land which, since a 1951 annexation, has been taxed as part of the municipality of Town & Country. In 1988, plaintiff filed an action for declaratory judgment, requesting a declaration that the 1951 annexation was void as to this property. The then-existing statute under which the land was annexed, § 80.030 RSMo 1949, stated that a municipality could not annex farm land unless it had the owner’s consent. Plaintiff claims the tract in question was farm land in 1951 and that relator did not obtain consent to the annexation. In support, plaintiff cites a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cherry v. City of Hayti HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. White v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. In re the Incorporation of the Town of Blue SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Division of Adult Institutions, Department of Corrections & Human Resources v. BrackmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Julian v. City of LibertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State Ex Inf. Sanders Ex Rel. City of Lee's Summit v. City of Lake LotawanaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API