N.H. v. Vickers
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrawley, Judge
Although I concur in affirming the dismissal of N.H.’s action against Norris because of N.H.’s failure to perfect service on Norris, I must dissent from affirming the dismissal of N.H.’s action against Vick-ers. The trial court ordered N.H. to file a motion for a default judgment within 30 days of its order, that is, by April 30, 2002. From what appears in the record, N.H., who is incarcerated, placed the motion in the prison mail system on April 30, 2002. Unlike the main opinion, I would hold that the “mailbox rule” set out in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ex Parte AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Talley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001