Legal Opinion

In re Irvin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for habeas corpus. The petitioner having been convicted before a justice of the peace on a criminal prosecution for an assault and battery, appealed to the circuit. Being there convicted the court sentenced him to pay a fine of two hundred dollars, and on failing to pay the fine, to be imprisoned for ■one year.

Read the full summary

Application for habeas corpus. The petitioner having been convicted before a justice of the peace on a criminal prosecution for an assault and battery, appealed to the circuit. Being there convicted the court sentenced him to pay a fine of two hundred dollars, and on failing to pay the fine, to be imprisoned for ■one year. He made default and was imprisoned pursuant to the sentence, and is still in jail under it, although moré than three months have elapsed since his imprisonment began. The prosecuting attorney and the attorney general unite in a request for a decision upon the legality of…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

held that the circuit was confined to the same measure of punishment as the justice, and that Upon the facts as represented the further detention of the petitioner is illegal.

An order must be entered allowing a habeas corpus to issue on the application of the petitioner or his attorney, unless he shall be otherwise released.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API