Legal Opinion
The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. F. H. Hanna and Margaret Hanna, His Wife
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1955No. 15249_1PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, District Judge.
The appellant (hereinafter called Aetna) was the defendant below in an action brought by Dr. and Mrs. Hanna to recover damages under the terms of a “Comprehensive Personal Liability Policy,” in the face amount of $10,000.00, issued by Aetna to the Hannas June 25, 1946.
The principal residence premises were stated in the policy to be 1299 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, which the.policy shows was also the location of the Doctor’s office. The policy stated that in addition to all premises where the Insured or his spouse maintain a residence, the word “Premises” means “.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- C. E. Carnes & Co. v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Brock v. HardieSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Desrochers v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Hanna v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Gasque v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.