State Ex Rel. Rucker v. Tapp

The Superior Court of Oklahoma County is not allowed to continue in operation because the majority concludes that part (b)* of Sec. 161 must be “restricted” in its scope hy the county population classification prescribed in part (I). My disagreement with the course which the Court has taken in the present case is based on two considerations —First, it is my view that the use of interpretative devices to construe Sec. 161 is unwarranted by the remote and purely .anticipatory nature of the “Incongruity” which the Court finds in the statutory language and which it seeks to avoid; Second, the…