George K. Austin, Jr. v. Marco Dental Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises issues concerning a patent’s validity and infringement: (a) the “on sale” proscription; (b) nonobviousness; (e) combination of known elements; (d) standards for reissuance and (e) intervening rights.
Appellee, George K. Austin, Jr., alleges that appellant, Marco Dental Products, Inc. (Marco Dental), infringed Claim No. 1 in his patent [U. S. Patent No. Re 28,649] for a “dental handpiece control.” His company, Adec, Inc., manufactures it under the trade name “Auto-Trol.” Marco Dental sells a similar device.
Claim No. 1 describes a mechanism…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Dann v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Kaufman Company, Inc. v. Lantech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Photo Electronics Corporation v. John M. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Ferrex Corporation, Photo Electronics Corporation v. Ferrex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.