Legal Opinion

Peters v. Highley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1984No. 13166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant filed a motion asking the trial court to modify a dissolution decree by granting him custody of the parties’ minor child, a female aged 10. After hearing evidence and interviewing the child, the trial court denied the motion.

As the moving party appellant had the burden to prove facts establishing that the modification was necessary. Henderson v. Henderson, 622 S.W.2d 7, 9 (Mo.App.1981). He did not meet that burden.

We have carefully examined the record and have determined that the trial court’s findings and judgment are supported by substantial evidence and are not against the weight…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fetters v. HighleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API