Legal Opinion

Nieves v. North River Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 2010No. 4D09-4730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether an excess insurer has satisfied the terms of section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes, requiring an excess carrier to “make available” uninsured motorist protection, when it notifies the insured that excess UM coverage is available without charge, conditioned on the insured’s purchase of uninsured motorist protection in its primary policy. We hold, as did the trial court, that the excess insurer has complied with the statute. We thus affirm.

This declaratory judgment action emanated from a wrongful death action *812brought by Ana Nieves, as personal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  4. Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. Kephart v. HadiSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lapham v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  2. Maria Theresa Guaniro Zamora v. ACE American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Zurich American Insurance Co. v. CernogorskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API