Legal Opinion

United States v. Fieck

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 19, 2014No. Case No. 2:14-CR-14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

Defendant is charged with manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On August 5, 2014, the Magistrate Judge held a hearing on Defendant’s motion to quash search warrant, to suppress alleged evidence, and for dismissal. (ECF No. 13.) The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that Defendant’s motion to quash search warrant, to suppress evidence, and for dismissal be denied. (ECF No. 28.) This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s objections to the R *843& R. (ECF No. 34.) For the reasons that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ConklinDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Smith v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Stanford v. Northmont City SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API